Amber Louise Culley
City/Township Council · Kitchener Ward 6
Back to candidatesHousing & Homelessness 3 questions
Housing & Homelessness
- Prioritize rapid acquisition or conversion of existing buildings
- Partner with non-profit and supportive housing providers
- I would put these ahead of simply focusing on market supply
- Establish and maintain clear minimum standards (sanitation, safety, outreach)
- Expand the hours and capacity of extreme-weather shelter protections beyond current levels
- Require that enforcement actions be linked to the availability of adequate indoor alternatives
- Establish clear regional leadership with coordinated municipal roles
- Assign clear municipal responsibility for public-space management
- Publish ongoing performance metrics (e.g. housing placements, shelter bed access)
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words
I would support a Housing Pathway and Public Space Standard that connects encampment management directly to measurable housing, shelter and support outcomes. The scale of the problem requires us to do both things at once: create more permanent housing while maintaining safe, sanitary and accessible public spaces. The Region's October 22, 2024 Point-in-Time Count identified 2,371 people experiencing homelessness. Of those, 1,009 were living rough, meaning they were living in encampments, on the street or in a vehicle; 446 were staying in emergency shelters; 353 were experiencing hidden homelessness; 221 were in transitional housing; and 153 were staying in Region- funded motels. Of the 1,790 people who completed the survey, 78% reported experiencing chronic homelessness.Those numbers tell me that encampments cannot be addressed simply as a public-space issue. They are also a housing and homelessness-system issue. At the same time, we need to recognize that progress is possible. In 2025, the Region supported 809 people from homelessness into permanent housing, including 390 people experiencing chronic homelessness. The Region reports that between 2022 and 2025, the number of people supported from chronic homelessness into permanent housing increased by 61%.I would build on that work by establishing clear standards for what should happen when an encampment is being managed or closed: There should be minimum standards for sanitation, fire and public safety, accessibility and outreach. People living in an encampment should receive meaningful assistance identifying available shelter, supportive housing and permanent-housing options. Where enforcement or relocation is necessary because of safety, accessibility, environmental or other legitimate public-space concerns, the process should be coordinated with available indoor alternatives and individualized housing plans wherever possible. Extreme-weather responses should have sufficient capacity and hours to protect people from dangerous conditions. Results should be publicly reported—not simply the number of encampments closed, but the number of people connected to shelter, permanent housing, supportive housing and other services. We should also accelerate the supply of deeply affordable and supportive housing. The Region's current affordable-housing plan aims to create or preserve up to 3,500 affordable homes by the end of 2029, with 2,100—60%—intended for very-low- to low-income households. The Region says its previous target of 2,500 homes was exceeded, with affordable-housing production increasing from an historical average of approximately 50 units per year to approximately 500 units per year. My measure of success would therefore be broader than simply moving people out of tents. I would want to see measurable reductions in chronic homelessness, more permanent housing placements, greater supportive-housing capacity, appropriate shelter access during emergencies, and public spaces that remain safe and accessible. We should measure whether people have actually moved toward housing stability—not simply whether an encampment has disappeared from a particular location.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on housing?candidate's own words
Waterloo Region's housing challenge is also a challenge of time, access and supportive services. The Region reported that in February 2024 there were 558 people on the Prioritized Access to Housing Supports PATHS list, and people on that list had spent an average of 1,403 days, about 3 years and 8 months, without permanent and safe housing. The Region's 2024 chronic homelessness plan also reported that chronic homelessness had increased 129 percent since January 2020. Today, the Region states that demand for supportive housing is greater than the available resources and that immediate access is not currently available through PATHS. At the same time, the Region administers more than 10,000 community housing units and programs, demonstrating the importance of protecting and expanding deeply affordable housing rather than relying only on new market construction. There are also practical examples of targeted solutions. The Region opened a 20 bed, 24 hour emergency shelter for women and gender diverse people in Cambridge in 2025, while the 84 Frederick Street project in Kitchener now provides 66 emergency, transitional and supportive housing spaces, including 44 spaces added through renovations and wraparound mental health, addictions, life skills and housing stability supports. In 2026, the Region approved $2.9 million for A Better Tent City's site operations, another $2.8 million for expanded low barrier access and stronger permanent and supportive housing outcomes, and proposed $2.5 million in one time capital funding subject to the 2027 budget process. These figures reinforce my view that we need a continuum that includes prevention before someone becomes homeless, emergency shelter when necessary, low barrier interim options during crises, supportive housing for people who need ongoing assistance, and permanent affordable housing. We should also measure how long people remain homeless, how quickly they move through the system, and whether they remain housed, not simply how many beds or buildings we add.
Getting Around 4 questions
Getting Around
- Reallocate space on selected streets (e.g. road diets, transit lanes, protected bike lanes)
- Adjust signal timing, curb use, or intersection design
- Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
- Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
- Use transit to shape land use
- Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
- Prioritize expanding coverage area
- Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
Yes, sidewalks should be cleared alongside roads as part of regular winter maintenance
Yes, for specific groups
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on transportation?candidate's own words
Transportation is about much more than moving cars. It is about giving residents realistic choices to reach work, school, health care, shopping, recreation and their communities. Grand River Transit carried 22.1 million riders in 2025 and operates approximately 50 routes with 2,400 stops, while ION achieved 95.3 percent on time performance. Kitchener has also demonstrated that investment in active transportation can produce measurable use, with the Downtown Cycling Grid recording more than 160,000 users in 2025 and approximately 10 kilometres of new and upgraded infrastructure. I want to build on that progress while addressing the gaps that still make walking, cycling and transit difficult or unsafe in some neighbourhoods. In Ward 6, I would focus particularly on connections around Homer Watson Boulevard, Fairway Road, Ottawa Street South, Block Line Road, schools, commercial areas and transit. I also believe winter accessibility needs greater attention. Kitchener currently requires property owners to clear sidewalks within 24 hours, while the City clears selected sidewalks and all bike lanes within 24 hours after snowfall. For residents who rely on walking, mobility devices or transit, an uncleared sidewalk can effectively become a barrier to the entire transportation system. My approach would be to prioritize safe, accessible connections, improve transit reliability, use existing road space more efficiently, and make transportation investments based on measurable outcomes, accessibility and the needs of residents who have the fewest transportation options.
If you selected "Yes, for specific groups" above, which groups?candidate's own words
Seniors (ex. extend Older Adult Day Pass pilot), People with disabilities, Low-income residents
Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words
A transit investment should be evaluated not only by how many people it moves, but by who can access it, how reliably they can access it, how much it costs them, and whether it connects them to employment, education, health care, housing and essential services. That includes accessibility for people with disabilities, seniors, families, people without access to a vehicle and residents with lower incomes. A fast transit system that someone cannot afford, physically access or reliably reach is not truly an accessible transportation system.
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Accessibility, affordability and reliability
Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words
I would prioritize Homer Watson Boulevard and its connections to the surrounding neighbourhoods and transit network. Homer Watson is particularly relevant because the Region has previously identified deficiencies in pedestrian and cycling facilities along the corridor and planned improvements including a multi use trail, intersection improvements and pedestrian bridges. The broader objective should be to make Homer Watson safer and more comfortable for people walking, cycling, rolling and accessing transit, while maintaining appropriate vehicle movement. I would also support strengthening the Homer Watson, Ottawa Street South, Block Line Road and Fairway Road connections, particularly where they connect residents to schools, employment, shopping, community facilities and transit. Kitchener has demonstrated that these investments can change how people move. The City's Downtown Cycling Grid added approximately 10 kilometres of new and upgraded infrastructure and recorded more than 160,000 users in 2025. The City has also reported a 164 percent increase in cycling ridership following development of the downtown cycling grid. Kitchener's new Route 1 provides a connection between The Boardwalk and downtown that can be travelled by bicycle in approximately 26 minutes, almost entirely on trails. These examples show why I support designing transportation as a connected network rather than isolated pieces of infrastructure.
Climate & Sustainability 3 questions
Climate & Sustainability
- Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
- Commitments passed by previous councils, like the 50x30 pledge or declarations of climate emergencies, should guide current council decision making
- Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
- Where possible, require or incentivize energy efficiency standards in new development, beyond current provincial minimums
- Create financial incentives for low-carbon construction (e.g. development charge reductions, expedited approvals, density bonuses)
- Require green infrastructure as part of development approvals (e.g. stormwater management, tree canopy, permeable surfaces)
- Require climate risk and lifecycle cost analysis in major capital decisions
- Prioritize active transportation and transit investment
- Align municipal operations (fleet, facilities, procurement) with regional climate commitments
Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words
I believe sustainability should be built into everyday municipal decision making rather than treated as a separate issue. For Ward 6 and the broader Region, that means protecting our drinking water and aquifers, improving stormwater management, preserving trees and natural areas, preparing for extreme weather, and making it easier for residents to walk, cycle and use public transit. It also means being fiscally responsible. When we build roads, buildings, parks, water infrastructure or community facilities, we should consider the full lifetime cost, including energy, maintenance, repairs and replacement, rather than focusing only on the initial price tag. I support practical climate action that produces measurable benefits for residents, including lower operating costs, healthier neighbourhoods, greater resilience and better public spaces. I also believe municipalities should work collaboratively with the Region, conservation authorities, Indigenous communities, residents, businesses and the provincial and federal governments because environmental challenges do not stop at municipal boundaries. Good sustainability policy should protect the environment while also making our communities more affordable, accessible, resilient and livable for current and future generations.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on sustainability?candidate's own words
For me, sustainability is fundamentally about responsible long term decision making. Waterloo Region is growing quickly, and the infrastructure we approve today can remain in place for 50 years or more. That means we need to consider climate resilience, energy costs, water protection, transportation and long term maintenance when making today's decisions. Kitchener's TransformWR partnership has established a regional goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050, while the City's own climate action planning has identified buildings, transportation and waste as important areas for local action. Climate adaptation is equally important. The Grand River watershed is vulnerable to flooding, extreme rainfall, drought and changing weather patterns, while groundwater and aquifer protection are particularly important in Waterloo Region because groundwater provides drinking water for hundreds of thousands of residents. I believe environmental responsibility and fiscal responsibility can reinforce one another when we evaluate the full lifecycle cost of infrastructure, reduce energy consumption, prevent costly stormwater and flooding problems, and build neighbourhoods where residents can walk, cycle and use public transit. My approach would be evidence based and practical: set measurable targets, use incentives where they can accelerate better outcomes, protect natural systems, and make sure taxpayers understand both the upfront cost and the long term financial consequences of major decisions.
Food Systems & Security 3 questions
Food Systems & Security
- Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
- Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
- Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
- Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
- Leave local food livelihoods to the private market
- Partner with local charities, non-profits, and other organizations to strengthen access to food and redistribution of surplus food and produce for low-income residents
- Support local food procurement for school food programs, including processing/preparation infrastructure, food literacy, and youth learning opportunities
- Support programs to prepare food for those who are unhoused or unable to cook
- Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
- Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
- Encourage and support private landowners to make lots available for food provisioning
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words
I would support creating a Waterloo Region Local Food Access and Growing Program that makes an increased amount of suitable municipal and regional land available for community gardens, new farmers, food growing projects and low barrier local food markets. I would prioritize neighbourhoods with limited access to affordable fresh food and partner with community organizations, farmers, food banks, schools, universities and colleges to provide growing space, training, food preparation, storage and distribution. I would also support developing a local food hub that could provide shared processing, storage and distribution capacity for smaller farmers and food businesses that cannot afford those facilities independently. This would address food insecurity while also supporting local agriculture and entrepreneurship. It would build on policies the Region already has supporting community gardens and local food systems rather than creating an entirely new bureaucracy. The goal should be to increase access to nutritious food, create opportunities for local producers, reduce food waste and strengthen the economic viability of our local food system.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on food systems?candidate's own words
Food insecurity is ultimately an affordability issue as much as an access issue. Waterloo Region reported that 23 percent of households experienced food insecurity in 2023, while the 2024 nutritious food basket cost a family of four approximately $1,165.65 per month. At the same time, our community is surrounded by productive agricultural land and has an opportunity to strengthen the connection between local producers and local consumers. The Region's planning framework already recognizes that a strong local food system supports farmers, rural communities, healthier communities and economic resilience. I believe we should protect our agricultural land while also making it economically viable to farm, process and sell food locally. Municipalities can contribute through land use planning, community gardens, public land, markets, procurement, food hubs and partnerships with non profits and educational institutions. I also want us to recognize the role of food in dignity. People who are unhoused, living with disabilities, seniors, families and individuals facing financial hardship should not have to choose between food, rent, medication or other basic needs. My approach would be to strengthen the organizations already doing this work, make better use of available public land and resources, support local producers and address the broader affordability pressures that cause food insecurity in the first place.
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Protect the agricultural land base
Growth & Planning 4 questions
Growth & Planning
Budget & Taxes 5 questions
Budget & Taxes
About the Candidate3 questions
About the Candidate
Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words
I have a strong dedication to community involvement locally, nationally and internationally. I have many experiences working with people and working within the City of Kitchener community services. I have a goal of being a mental health practitioner and am currently going through my qualifications to do so. This has for a long time been coupled with my interest in politics, political advocacy at the federal level, and desire to become a local, provincial or federal politician. I want to make a difference as someone who does not come from a wealthy or privileged background. I want to speak for the people and ensure the current conflicts of interests with the incumbent Paul Singh, who holds over 50% of the conflicts of interests for all of the City Council, is addressed and not continued. This government needs to be led by the community and represent the interests of the community. I feel I should be a representative for Kitchener because I genuinely believe in serving people, listening to their concerns, and working to make our community stronger, safer, and more connected. My commitment to community is rooted in the belief that elected representatives should be accessible, accountable, and willing to show up not only during an election period, but every day. I want to represent Ward 6 residents by listening to a wide range of voices, understanding the issues that affect families, seniors, youth, renters, homeowners, local businesses, and those who may feel overlooked, and bringing those concerns forward with honesty and determination. I am committed to being a representative who follows through, communicates openly, and treats every resident with dignity and respect. For me, public service is about putting the community first, building relationships, supporting local initiatives and organizations, and working collaboratively to find practical solutions. I would be proud to dedicate my time, energy, and experience to serving the residents of Ward 6 and contributing to a Kitchener where people feel heard, valued, and confident that their representative is working on their behalf. I have vast experiences in different organizational and community spaces that equips me to serve the community honestly with dedication, motivation, active listening and care. I have been encouraged to consider running because people who know me and have seen my commitment to community service have encouraged me to take that commitment a step further and seek a formal role in representing residents. Their encouragement has reinforced something I have increasingly recognized myself: meaningful community service requires not only caring about the issues around us, but also being willing to step forward, listen to others, take responsibility, and do the work necessary to create positive change. I have been fortunate to have conversations with people in my community who have encouraged me to use my willingness to help, my ability to listen, and my commitment to bringing people together in a way that can serve Ward 6. Ultimately, however, my decision to consider public office comes from my own belief that service is about showing up for people and being willing to contribute wherever I can. I see representing Ward 6 as an opportunity to turn that commitment into meaningful public service—by listening first, advocating responsibly, working collaboratively, and remaining accountable to the residents who place their trust in their representative. I have had a goal of becoming a mental health practitioner and politician for a while now. I am currently going through my qualifications to be a Registered Psychotherapy and Psychospiritual Therapist. I hope to serve communities through this work as well as serving in local, provincial and federal politics throughout my life as someone dedicated to community care, well-being, mental health, social justice and thriving communities. I support growth, but I believe the question is not simply how much we grow. It is how we grow and who pays for it. Waterloo Region is expected to continue experiencing significant population growth, so we need more housing of different types and price points. At the same time, roads, water systems, wastewater infrastructure, transit and public facilities have long term operating and replacement costs. I would prioritize thoughtful intensification where infrastructure already exists, gentle density in established neighbourhoods and growth around transit and services. When outward expansion is necessary, I want clear infrastructure plans, appropriate cost recovery and phasing. Residents deserve both housing affordability and responsible stewardship of public infrastructure. We should not solve today's housing shortage by creating tomorrow's unfunded infrastructure problem. I would support municipalities and the Region actively monitoring significant vacant development land and exploring tools such as: A vacant land registry for appropriately defined properties. Servicing agreements with clear development timelines. Holding provisions where legally appropriate. Time limited approvals or conditions where legislation permits. Public reporting on major approved but undeveloped sites. I would be cautious about simply imposing a tax or penalty without confirming provincial authority and the economic consequences. The objective should be to discourage speculative withholding of serviced or development ready land while avoiding unintended consequences for legitimate landowners, environmental constraints or complicated development projects. I would support prioritizing redevelopment and intensification within existing urban areas before expanding outward, particularly where roads, transit, water, wastewater and other infrastructure already exist. Before approving major greenfield expansion, Council should examine the full lifecycle cost of construction, operation, maintenance and eventual replacement, as well as who will pay those costs. Where expansion is necessary, I would support phased development tied to demonstrated infrastructure capacity and appropriate cost recovery. We need to build enough housing, but we should not create a pattern where today's development produces infrastructure liabilities that future taxpayers have to absorb. My basic principle is that we should not confuse building new infrastructure with being able to afford maintaining it for generations. I would support continuing to allow and encourage gentle, as of right intensification on existing residential lots, particularly near transit, schools and commercial areas, while protecting mature trees, parks, natural areas and existing green space. Kitchener already permits up to four dwelling units on many lots, and the City estimates this could create opportunities for additional housing on approximately 41,500 residential properties. I would build on that approach rather than relying primarily on outward expansion. The financial case is important too. New development creates costs for roads, water, sewer, fire protection and other infrastructure, while intensification can make better use of infrastructure that taxpayers have already paid for. Kitchener's development charge system recognizes these growth related costs, with current suburban residential charges ranging from approximately $22,184 for a townhouse to $31,587 for a single or semi detached dwelling, depending on the type of development. At the same time, I would make sure intensification contributes appropriately to parks and public space. Kitchener s parkland policy requires eligible residential development to contribute land or cash in lieu, and the City's Parks Master Plan targets 10 square metres of local park space per person. My goal would be to add housing without sacrificing the trees, parks and natural spaces that make neighbourhoods livable. We can accommodate more people, strengthen the municipal tax base, make better use of existing infrastructure and protect green space by focusing growth in the right places and requiring good design. I would support a budget that clearly shows residents very clearly (and advertises it well): What their average property tax increase actually costs. Where every major portion of their tax dollar goes. Which services are increasing or decreasing in cost. How much major projects will cost over their entire lifespan. How much debt and interest taxpayers will ultimately pay. Whether projects are coming in on time and on budget. How City and Regional decisions affect household costs. The current council must stop 'patting themselves on the back" over a small property tax increase and instead focus on making that decrease, increasing trades and industry and increasing business while not allowing for more ridiculous salary increases of 30-55% in one year for some municipal staff with others struggle. Also, there needs to be accountability regarding major conflicts of interest Paul Singh has in Ward 6 with development, companies and property. I would prioritize maintaining essential services and existing infrastructure before approving lower priority capital projects, especially when costs are rising faster than revenues. With Kitchener managing approximately $15 billion in public assets, every major project should clearly show its upfront cost, long term maintenance cost, funding source and impact on taxpayers. Residents deserve transparent choices about where their money goes, with a focus on keeping the overall cost of living as affordable as possible.
How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words
The current division of responsibilities requires stronger coordination
Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words
A development decision may be made locally, while some of the infrastructure needed to support that growth, such as water, wastewater or regional transportation, is managed at the regional level. That division can make coordination essential. The Region's current water-capacity work in the Mannheim Service Area illustrates this clearly: the Region manages the water system, while area municipalities now have important planning and development-approval responsibilities. The Region has therefore been providing technical and advisory information to municipalities to support their decisions. I believe residents should be able to see clearly how these decisions connect: where housing is being planned, what infrastructure capacity exists, who is responsible for each decision, and how the different levels of government are coordinating. Good governance should make that chain of responsibility easier, not harder, for residents to understand.