Bryan Causarano-Bolton
Regional Council ยท Region of Waterloo
Back to candidatesHousing & Homelessness 3 questions
Housing & Homelessness
- Partner with non-profit and supportive housing providers
- Use publicly owned land for permanent or interim housing
- Increase funding for deeply affordable and supportive housing
- Establish and maintain clear minimum standards (sanitation, safety, outreach)
- Expand the hours and capacity of extreme-weather shelter protections beyond current levels
- Allow temporary encampments to persist while permanent housing options are actively being developed
- Establish clear regional leadership with coordinated municipal roles
- Assign clear municipal responsibility for public-space management
- Actively advocate to the province for defined funding triggers and program supports
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words
In accordance with Justice Gibson's ruling on 100 Victoria, I would advocate for establishing a safe tenting protocol. A Safe Tenting Protocol is a reasonable and practical policy tool that can be used by municipalities to balance competing needs of shared public spaces, while we implement supportive, transitional, and deeply affordable housing throughout the region.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on housing?candidate's own words
The region is growing, which means we need more housing. A balance of multi-family dwellings in both rental and ownership options is important, and so it supportive and cooperative housing. We need these options to be around existing services and transit routes. An approach to housing that considers all income-levels is an important part of protecting people from experiencing homelessness, while we address the current crisis with homelessness through shelters, transitional housing, and deeply affordable housing options.
Getting Around 4 questions
Getting Around
- Reallocate space on selected streets (e.g. road diets, transit lanes, protected bike lanes)
- Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
- Focus improvements around schools, transit corridors, and commercial areas
- Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
- Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
- Use transit to shape land use
- Prioritize expanding coverage area
- Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
Yes, sidewalks should be cleared alongside roads as part of regular winter maintenance
Yes, for specific groups
If you selected "Yes, for specific groups" above, which groups?candidate's own words
Seniors (ex. extend Older Adult Day Pass pilot), People with disabilities, Low-income residents
Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words
accessibility. Transit should be for everyone.
Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words
The Hespeler Rd Corridor is currently dangerous for cyclists. This area has a huge growth opportunity for both housing and businesses, and roads should be designed to provide more access for public transit and cycling routes, which will reduce the number of cars that must use this area.
Climate & Sustainability 3 questions
Climate & Sustainability
- Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
- Commitments passed by previous councils, like the 50x30 pledge or declarations of climate emergencies, should guide current council decision making
- Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
- Where possible, require or incentivize energy efficiency standards in new development, beyond current provincial minimums
- Create financial incentives for low-carbon construction (e.g. development charge reductions, expedited approvals, density bonuses)
- Require green infrastructure as part of development approvals (e.g. stormwater management, tree canopy, permeable surfaces)
- Require climate risk and lifecycle cost analysis in major capital decisions
- Prioritize active transportation and transit investment
- Align municipal operations (fleet, facilities, procurement) with regional climate commitments
Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words
One of our biggest emissions comes from our buildings. I would incentivize retrofitting that reduce carbon emissions on existing buildings to help replace outdated technology that is causing a strain on our environment.
Food Systems & Security 3 questions
Food Systems & Security
- Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
- Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
- Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
- Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
- Leave local food livelihoods to the private market
- Partner with local charities, non-profits, and other organizations to strengthen access to food and redistribution of surplus food and produce for low-income residents
- Support local food procurement for school food programs, including processing/preparation infrastructure, food literacy, and youth learning opportunities
- Support programs to prepare food for those who are unhoused or unable to cook
- Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
- Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
- Implement a plan to replace old or dying trees on public property with fruit-bearing trees
- harvested to provide to food banks.
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words
Partner with local organizations to create sustainable food programs in schools. Children who are hungry are unable to focus on learning. Food programs that ensure kids get meals at school, and go home with groceries for their families, can help us combat hunger in the community.
Growth & Planning 4 questions
Growth & Planning
- Prioritize infill and intensification where infrastructure
- Require detailed cost and risk analysis before approving
- Use development phasing tied to infrastructure capacity
- Limit outward growth unless full lifecycle infrastructure
- Proceed with outward growth to address housing supply
- Focus incremental density near transit, schools, and commercial areas
- Allow small-scale housing forms city-wide as-of-right (e.g. up to four units per lot)
- Require area-specific planning studies before permitting additional density
- Use public engagement to inform design, not to veto density
- Phase or adjust density in response to neighbourhood concerns about design or servicing capacity
- Require demonstrated city-wide benefits to justify local impacts
- Approve density where infrastructure capacity already exists
- Pair density approvals with targeted infrastructure upgrades
- Accept short-term constraints in order to meet housing demand
Describe one concrete zoning, planning, or development decision you would support (or oppose) that reflects how you would balance these priorities.candidate's own words
Focus higher-density, mixed-use development along existing and planned transit corridors, while requiring that growth be matched with infrastructure and community amenities.
Please describe one concrete example of a growth or infrastructure decision you would support or oppose using this approach.candidate's own words
Conditioning major new growth on demonstrated infrastructure capacity and a clear plan for who pays the full lifecycle cost of servicing it. Growth should pay for upgrades, infrastructure should be available when people need it, and taxpayers should not be left carrying the long-term cost of inefficient development patterns.
What can the municipality/region do, if anything, about land which sits vacant for years because it is being used as an investment (land banking)?candidate's own words
Prioritize infrastructure where it delivers housing and community value, and use the planning and financial tools available to encourage land that is designated for development to actually be developed.
Budget & Taxes 5 questions
Budget & Taxes
It should be more transparent and accessible
- Moderate, predictable tax increases to maintain service levels
- Area-specific levies where residents in a defined area receive or request a distinct level of service
- Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
- Ensure new development pays a greater share of long-term infrastructure costs
- Re-evaluate development incentives or subsidies that create long-term liabilities
- Adjust service delivery models to reduce costs without reducing access
- Prioritize maintenance and state-of-good-repair over expansion
- Require lifecycle cost analysis before approving any new infrastructure
Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words
I would support deferring a lower-priority capital expansion when necessary to protect the maintenance and renewal of infrastructure we already depend on. We can't build for tomorrow by neglecting today. Maintaining what we own can save us from costly repairs and upgrades later.
If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words
It's not just about access to the budget, it's about understanding of it. Communicating what the budget means, and why those decisions are made are part of transparency.
Water Supply (Regional) 1 questions
Water Supply (Regional)
- Prioritize immediate investment in water conservation programs and demand management
- Accelerate exploration of alternative water sources (wells, treated wastewater reuse, inter-municipal supply)
- Commission an independent technical review of all options before committing to major new infrastructure
- Pursue a Lake Erie pipeline connection with provincial and federal cost-sharing
- Approve developments now and resolve water supply constraints in the future
About the Candidate3 questions
About the Candidate
Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words
I am a small business owner, and create events for our community that bring people together. I want to do more to effect positive change for Cambridge.
How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words
I would support better communication and alignment between the region and the cities to reduce gaps and positively affect affordability
Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words
Our Regional Government provides funding for organizations that provided public health, mental health, and addictions support, and support for those experiencing homelessness. The City of Cambridge creates barriers for these services, and discards peoples tents and belongings, including the spare clothing, identification, and supplies provided to them by Regional funding. It's tax dollars being used to damage tax dollars.