Jamie Hari
City/Township Council Β· Waterloo
Back to candidatesHousing & Homelessness 3 questions
Housing & Homelessness
- Partner with non-profit and supportive housing providers
- Increase funding for deeply affordable and supportive housing
- Directly build and operate additional public non-market housing.
- Establish and maintain clear minimum standards (sanitation, safety, outreach)
- Require that enforcement actions be linked to the availability of adequate indoor alternatives
- Allow temporary encampments to persist while permanent housing options are actively being developed
- Assign clear municipal responsibility for public-space management
- Actively advocate to the province for defined funding triggers and program supports
- Publish ongoing performance metrics (e.g. housing placements, shelter bed access)
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words
Create a new public rental registry which requires all landlords to be licensed and disclose their rental holdings and complete rental histories on a municipal website as part of a larger rent control program expansion.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on housing?candidate's own words
Housing is a human right and believe it's the government's legal obligation to guarantee it, irrespective of the budgetary cost. I also believe that billionaires caused this affordability issue and so should be the ones pay to fix it; we can't raise taxes on the middle class or cutt other social services.
Getting Around 4 questions
Getting Around
- Reallocate space on selected streets (e.g. road diets, transit lanes, protected bike lanes)
- Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
- Close busy ION corridors and heavy pedestrian traffic areas to regular car traffic.
- Use transit to shape land use
- Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
- Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
- Prioritize expanding coverage area
- Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
Yes, sidewalks should be cleared alongside roads as part of regular winter maintenance
Yes, for all residents
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on transportation?candidate's own words
While not the first one that comes to mind, personal mobility is a human right too!
Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words
Accessibility must not be compromised at any cost. Transit must be for everyone!
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Local transit should be free; I would propose dramatically cutting the Waterloo Regional Police Service (WRPS) budget in favour of reducing or eliminating transit rider fees.
Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words
While not the most important change, something that could be implemented relatively quickly would be to close King St S in both directions to regular car traffic, between Laurel Trail (Waterloo Public Square) and Union Boulevard.
Climate & Sustainability 3 questions
Climate & Sustainability
- Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
- Commitments passed by previous councils, like the 50x30 pledge or declarations of climate emergencies, should guide current council decision making
- Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
- Require green infrastructure as part of development approvals (e.g. stormwater management, tree canopy, permeable surfaces)
- Use development agreements to require climate sustainability measures as a condition of approval
- Implement new punitive fines for builders and landlords found in violation of existing and expanded environmental building standards.
- Require climate risk and lifecycle cost analysis in major capital decisions
- Prioritize active transportation and transit investment
- Require climate change mitigation and adaptation impact assessments for large growth decisions (greenfield expansions
- settlement boundary changes) AND Require an assessment of impacts on aquifer recharge.
Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words
Mandate energy performance standards for all new housing (i.e., rental and purchased) and all existing rental properties.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on sustainability?candidate's own words
The planet is literally dying and somehow we are not in the streets with pitchforks every day demanding action from our governments. We've officially passed 1.5C; terrible global impacts are now inevitable. The only thing we can do now is act to lessen how bad it will be.
Food Systems & Security 3 questions
Food Systems & Security
- Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
- Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
- Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
- Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
- Leave local food livelihoods to the private market
- Support the development of community buying clubs or municipal grocery stores
- Support programs to prepare food for those who are unhoused or unable to cook
- Fully subsidize local charities
- non-profits
- and other organizations to guarantee access to food locally
- as necessary.
- Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
- Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
- Introduce a vacant arable land surtax on local privately-owned land that is gated up for profit while people starve
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words
Introduce a deluge of new bylaws intended to undermine monopolistic and other uncompetitive practices by corporate grocers like Walmart, Metro, Zehrs, and Sobey's to protect local farmers and independent grocers.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on food systems?candidate's own words
There's absolutely no excuse for the profit motive in the food sector. Food is a human right and I'd entirely ban private corporations from the entire industry, if I had my way.
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Create and operate and city-owned nonprofit grocer.
Growth & Planning 4 questions
Growth & Planning
- Prioritize infill and intensification where infrastructure
- Limit outward growth unless full lifecycle infrastructure
- Require detailed cost and risk analysis before approving
- Use development phasing tied to infrastructure capacity
- Proceed with outward growth to address housing supply
- Expand as-of-right zoning to reduce case-by-case political decisions on housing forms
- Focus incremental density near transit, schools, and commercial areas
- Allow small-scale housing forms city-wide as-of-right (e.g. up to four units per lot)
- Eliminate parking minimum requirements
- Use public engagement to inform design, not to veto density
- Proceed with adopted plans when facing local NIMBY opposition
- Approve density where infrastructure capacity already exists
- Pair density approvals with targeted infrastructure upgrades
- Use development charges or conditions to fund needed upgrades
Describe one concrete zoning, planning, or development decision you would support (or oppose) that reflects how you would balance these priorities.candidate's own words
A big part of our water infrastructure issues is sprawl. Transit corridors should prioritize public use and dense residential, not more McMansions.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on growth?candidate's own words
We can't and shouldn't tell people where to live, but we can prohibit wealthy corporations and individuals from taking far more than is sustainable or than they even need.
What can the municipality/region do, if anything, about land which sits vacant for years because it is being used as an investment (land banking)?candidate's own words
While it's currently impractical to entirely stop contracting public works to private industry, we can tighten up contracts significantly with developers who consistently overcharge, under-deliver, and get away with no accountability. Similarly, while we can't ban landlords, I would propose making it far less profitable to speculate undeveloped and underdeveloped land in the city with vacancy taxes and increase civic pressure with a public land registry.
Budget & Taxes 5 questions
Budget & Taxes
It should be more transparent and accessible
- Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
- Change the flat percentage tax rate to a progressive tax
- where the rate is exponentially higher as the value of the property is further from the median property value. In effect
- houses under the median will see a property tax decrease while mansions will see significant tax increases.
- Ensure new development pays a greater share of long-term infrastructure costs
- Re-evaluate development incentives or subsidies that create long-term liabilities
- Increase a suite of new progressive development fees which aggressively de-incentivize unaffordable development (e.g.
- punitive surtaxes on units valued more than 100% above the median value)
- No cuts to services
- except cutting the Waterloo Regional Police Services (WRPS) budget by half.
- Prioritize maintenance and state-of-good-repair over expansion
- Require lifecycle cost analysis before approving any new infrastructure
- Defer or cancel capital projects with low long-term return on investment
- except critical infrastructure projects
Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words
I vehemently oppose setting user fees or creating any new fees that aren't means-tested. It's absolutely unsustainable, not to mention unfair, to ask the most vulnerable to pay any more than they already are.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on budgets?candidate's own words
Human needs are human rights - and should be above the budgetary process. We can debate how much to spend on fireworks and flowers, but there's not debate about how many people in our region should have food and shelter.
If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words
Enshrining free FOIA requests in the constitution would be nice, but in the meantime having an interactive website like OurCommons.ca for City and Regional councils would be great!
About the Candidate3 questions
About the Candidate
Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words
I first got into politics in 2025, when I ran for Member of Parliament for Waterloo in the federal election. My two main motivations for running again this year remain: to spend time with my son, who is attending Wilfrid Laurier for Political Science this fall, and ultimately to make a better future possible for him. We had a fun (and educational) experience last year going through the process to get nominated, collecting nomination signatures, preparing for the debate, and even doing a local radio show together on Radio Waterloo. I am looking forward to more of that time with him this election, too. With that said, things are seriously wrong and getting worse at an alarming rate, locally and globally. Unemployment, homelessness, food insecurity, and the cost of living are all at multi-year highs. Federally and provincially, our democratic rights are being eroded at an ever-faster pace. Municipal governments are consistently underfunded and scapegoated by the provincial government. I donβt blame municipal politicians for this, except for staying quiet about it. I think mayors need to get loud and actively fight back against the corruption at Queenβs Park and in the House of Commons.
How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words
Bill 100 was the final nail in the coffin for cities' ability to materially control their own destiny. Regions now have complete control and report directly to the Premier's office.
Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words
Transparency, which ultimately leads to accountability. Shady deals are made in dark corners for a reason. We need more time allotted to public review and comment on legislation, not less. Doug Ford has used his ill-gotten majority to fast-track bills which directly affect cities and regions without adequate consultation and feedback - and exempted himself from Freedom of Information requests! The same applies at the municipal level. The city and region have lots of work yet to do to make decisions more transparent to the public.