Moraa Mochama
City/Township Council ยท Waterloo Ward 2
Back to candidatesHousing & Homelessness 3 questions
Housing & Homelessness
- Use publicly owned land for permanent or interim housing
- Increase funding for deeply affordable and supportive housing
- Provide basic income to people
- Expand the hours and capacity of extreme-weather shelter protections beyond current levels
- Require that enforcement actions be linked to the availability of adequate indoor alternatives
- Allow temporary encampments to persist while permanent housing options are actively being developed
- Establish clear regional leadership with coordinated municipal roles
- Assign clear municipal responsibility for public-space management
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words
Establish legally binding compliance and enforcement mechanisms for developers who access public funding, ensuring they fulfill their affordable unit commitments. (i.e. If developers take public funds to build affordable homes, we need to ensure strict rules and penalties are in place so they actually deliver them).
Getting Around 4 questions
Getting Around
- Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
- Focus improvements around schools, transit corridors, and commercial areas
- Prioritize expanding coverage area
- Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
- Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
- Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
- Use transit to shape land use
Yes, sidewalks should be cleared alongside roads as part of regular winter maintenance
Yes, for specific groups
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on transportation?candidate's own words
High school students currently pay the same fare price as adults. This should not be case and a student price or free fare should be considered for those 18 and under.
Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words
Accessibility to transit: improvements to MobilityPlus,
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Expansion of Affordable Transit Program to include all high school students
Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words
Provide safe cycling opportunities to go West to East / East to West in the city. e.g. Erb Street
Climate & Sustainability 3 questions
Climate & Sustainability
- Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
- Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
- Create financial incentives for low-carbon construction (e.g. development charge reductions, expedited approvals, density bonuses)
- Use development agreements to require climate sustainability measures as a condition of approval
- Require climate risk and lifecycle cost analysis in major capital decisions
- Prioritize active transportation and transit investment
Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words
Ensure Indigenous People and organizations are included in conversations on climate impacts and achieving climate justice.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on sustainability?candidate's own words
Indigineous People are the first stewards of this land. Their knowledge systems are integral to developing solutions to the climate crisis especially at a municipal level. (Municipalities own approximately 60% of public infrastructure in Canada and have direct or indirect control of 44-50% of greenhouse gas emissions in Canada.)
Food Systems & Security 3 questions
Food Systems & Security
- Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
- Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
- Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
- Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
- Leave local food livelihoods to the private market
- Partner with local charities, non-profits, and other organizations to strengthen access to food and redistribution of surplus food and produce for low-income residents
- Support the development of community buying clubs or municipal grocery stores
- Support local food procurement for school food programs, including processing/preparation infrastructure, food literacy, and youth learning opportunities
- Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
- Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
- Encourage and support private landowners to make lots available for food provisioning
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words
Support the creation of more community gardens that are free or low cost
Growth & Planning 4 questions
Growth & Planning
- Prioritize infill and intensification where infrastructure
- Use development phasing tied to infrastructure capacity
- Proceed with outward growth to address housing supply
- Require detailed cost and risk analysis before approving
- Limit outward growth unless full lifecycle infrastructure
- Expand as-of-right zoning to reduce case-by-case political decisions on housing forms
- Focus incremental density near transit, schools, and commercial areas
- Use public engagement to inform design, not to veto density
- Phase or adjust density in response to neighbourhood concerns about design or servicing capacity
- Require demonstrated city-wide benefits to justify local impacts
- Approve density where infrastructure capacity already exists
- Pair density approvals with targeted infrastructure upgrades
What can the municipality/region do, if anything, about land which sits vacant for years because it is being used as an investment (land banking)?candidate's own words
vacant land registry
Budget & Taxes 5 questions
Budget & Taxes
It should be more transparent and accessible
- Moderate, predictable tax increases to maintain service levels
- Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
- Exploring new local revenue tools where permitted by provincial legislation
- Re-evaluate development incentives or subsidies that create long-term liabilities
- Maintain current service levels, even if taxes rise
- Improve current service levels for those that are not meeting resident standards and invest more in the ones residents have greatest satisfaction with (fire
- library
- recreation)
- Require lifecycle cost analysis before approving any new infrastructure
Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words
I would oppose any long term investment that leaves taxpayers down the road paying for it for years to come (e.g. RIM Park)
If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words
Prelim budgets should be shared out to residents and thresholds of engagement should be met prior to key decisions on budgets
About the Candidate3 questions
About the Candidate
Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words
Having immigrated to Canada as a child, I know firsthand what it means to feel unseen and unheard, especially in spaces where I often looked different from everyone around me. I am running to ensure Waterlooโs decisions reflect everyone who calls it homeโbringing an energetic, grounded voice to Council for local families, newcomers, and long-standing residents alike
How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words
Structural reform deserves serious study before the next election cycle
Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words
There are currently a few areas of overlap where the mandate is owned by one level of government but has strong impacts on another. One area that the City of Waterloo is specifically facing is development. The City is responsible for the strategy on how to grow and provide housing for its population growth, however, key infrastructure such as Water is a Regional mandate. With the current water crisis, Waterloo is unable to meet it's development targets while the region overall is experiencing a water shortage thus leaving the City to figure out how to maintain/attract development whilst also using every possible lever of influence to unblock the water crisis.