Victoria Robertson
City/Township Council ยท Waterloo Ward 3
Back to candidatesHousing & Homelessness 3 questions
Housing & Homelessness
- Prioritize rapid acquisition or conversion of existing buildings
- Partner with non-profit and supportive housing providers
- Increase funding for deeply affordable and supportive housing
- Establish and maintain clear minimum standards (sanitation, safety, outreach)
- Expand the hours and capacity of extreme-weather shelter protections beyond current levels
- Require that enforcement actions be linked to the availability of adequate indoor alternatives
- Establish clear regional leadership with coordinated municipal roles
- Actively advocate to the province for defined funding triggers and program supports
- Publish ongoing performance metrics (e.g. housing placements, shelter bed access)
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words
I am in favour of the proposed places of worship re-zoning by-law amendment, as I think itโs an excellent way to use land already within our city, designated for community support already, towards better housing. I would fight hard to make sure that most of all of that housing is affordable or explicitly supportive housing.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on housing?candidate's own words
One of my main concerns with current housing practices, particularly, in this ward, is that the city has been incentivising and allowing the building of mostly 1-2 bedroom apartment buildings, which are unaffordable and inaccessible. A main priority for me would be to push towards building apartments and townhouses which have 3 or 4 bedrooms, to support families; and to be intentional about building accessible housing for seniors to downsize in the neighbourhoods theyโve lived their whole lives. These need to have sufficient affordable units to be viable and actually support people in their neighbourhoods.
Getting Around 4 questions
Getting Around
- Reallocate space on selected streets (e.g. road diets, transit lanes, protected bike lanes)
- Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
- Focus improvements around schools, transit corridors, and commercial areas
- Use transit to shape land use
- Prioritize expanding coverage area
- Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
- Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
- Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
Yes, sidewalks should be cleared alongside roads as part of regular winter maintenance
Yes, for all residents
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on transportation?candidate's own words
I feel very strongly that connected and functional transit and active transportation are critical to the effective functioning of a city, and this is my main election priority in Ward 3.
Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words
Equity of access - many of the people relying on transit are not able to simply substitute car use, for accessibility or financial reasons, and we need to prioritizing supporting universal city connectvity.
Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words
In Ward 3, my biggest transportation concern is the speeding on near elementary schools. Northlake/Conservation is a corner which needs much more traffic calming, and would benefit from narrower roads and cycling safety infrastructure. Glenforrest, in front of Sir Edgar Bauer has significant traffic calming and residents point out that it still isn't working.
Climate & Sustainability 3 questions
Climate & Sustainability
- Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
- Climate change needs action and local governments can contribute in a few areas, but this is an issue better addressed at provincial and federal levels
- Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
- Where possible, require or incentivize energy efficiency standards in new development, beyond current provincial minimums
- Require green infrastructure as part of development approvals (e.g. stormwater management, tree canopy, permeable surfaces)
- Use development agreements to require climate sustainability measures as a condition of approval
- Prioritize active transportation and transit investment
- Require climate change mitigation and adaptation impact assessments for large growth decisions (greenfield expansions, settlement boundary changes)
- Require an assessment of impacts on aquifer recharge
Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words
Prioritizing effective land use choices such as mixed-use zoning, density, and active transport networks tied into greenways are campaign priorities, all of which tie into GHG emissions reductions. By incentivizing areas for effective public and active transport, we build a city where residents are not as dependent on cars, thereby reducing one of our primary emissions concerns.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on sustainability?candidate's own words
I have a Masters in Environmental Sciences, studying carbon emissions from thawing permafrost plateaus. I am intimately familiar with the urgency of this work, and feel that all levels of government must be taking responsibility for climate sustainability policy.
Food Systems & Security 3 questions
Food Systems & Security
- Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
- Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
- Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
- Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
- Leave local food livelihoods to the private market
- Partner with local charities, non-profits, and other organizations to strengthen access to food and redistribution of surplus food and produce for low-income residents
- Support the development of community buying clubs or municipal grocery stores
- Support local food procurement for school food programs, including processing/preparation infrastructure, food literacy, and youth learning opportunities
- Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
- Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
- Encourage and support private landowners to make lots available for food provisioning
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words
Ward 3 is home to a number of excellent community gardens, which are critical to the food systems for a number of the people in the community. There is currently work being done to expand a new Glenelm community garden, and I would be strongly in support of more community gardens and spaces across the ward. A component of this is also a public education campaign surrounding how to grow, and not picking other peoples foods.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on food systems?candidate's own words
I feel strongly that we should be partnering more effectively with our local farmers to have more local food available in small farmers markets, or even grocery stores. I believe prioritizing locally grown food is critical to continuing to support those food systems and growing a diversity of crops in the area.
Growth & Planning 4 questions
Growth & Planning
- Prioritize infill and intensification where infrastructure
- Limit outward growth unless full lifecycle infrastructure
- Use development phasing tied to infrastructure capacity
- Require detailed cost and risk analysis before approving
- Proceed with outward growth to address housing supply
- Expand as-of-right zoning to reduce case-by-case political decisions on housing forms
- Focus incremental density near transit, schools, and commercial areas
- Allow small-scale housing forms city-wide as-of-right (e.g. up to four units per lot)
- Use public engagement to inform design, not to veto density
- Approve density where infrastructure capacity already exists
- Pair density approvals with targeted infrastructure upgrades
- Use development charges or conditions to fund needed upgrades
Describe one concrete zoning, planning, or development decision you would support (or oppose) that reflects how you would balance these priorities.candidate's own words
A top priority for me is to avoid paving any more farmland, and solve city size issues within the currently developed areas. I would propose adding mixed residential and commercial zoning in areas that are currently small plazas, you could have the exact same businesses on the ground floor while adding housing above. This would also encourage accessible housing for folks who maybe cannot drive or need easy access to pharmacies or corner stores, etc.
Please describe one concrete example of a growth or infrastructure decision you would support or oppose using this approach.candidate's own words
I believe that we should be using infill to meet growth goals.
What can the municipality/region do, if anything, about land which sits vacant for years because it is being used as an investment (land banking)?candidate's own words
We should implement significant fees for land sitting vacant. Particularly in the context of developers, there is no reason to leave houses boarded up for years waiting for the market to "get better".
Budget & Taxes 5 questions
Budget & Taxes
It should be more transparent and accessible
- Area-specific levies where residents in a defined area receive or request a distinct level of service
- Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
- Exploring new local revenue tools where permitted by provincial legislation
- Ensure new development pays a greater share of long-term infrastructure costs
- Maintain current service levels, even if taxes rise
- Prioritize maintenance and state-of-good-repair over expansion
Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words
I would like to reduce or end our leaf collection program, potentially in exchange for a universal snow clearing program.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on budgets?candidate's own words
In the process of running for office, I have tried my best to understand the budget documents and process from the outside and found it rather opaque. I would love for the operating budget to have more clear language and be presented in a way most people could understand. Additionally, I believe that governments are responsible for taking care of their people, and that the city needs to run like a government, not like a business. Our goal is sustainability and long-term choices, not profit margins.
If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words
Right now the budgets are hard to parse as an outsider, and often the Master Plan reports are unclear. As a city councillor I intend to speak better to my constituents about the decisions I'm making, and push for clearer language in our budget documents.
About the Candidate3 questions
About the Candidate
Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words
Iโm running for City Council because I love Waterloo. I want to be a part of guiding our city such that we continue to grow sustainably long-term. I feel that city councillor is a role where you cn do so much good - in Waterloo, our wards are small enough that you can get to know most of the people you represent on a personal level, which allows us to be excellent advocates for our constituents. Part of my goal in running for city council in this election is to raise the bar on what it looks like to be a city councillor. Weโve been working since May to talk to everyone in my ward and genuinely understand what needs are present. City politics impact so much of people's daily quality of life, and I believe it should be treated seriously, and thatโs what Iโm striving to do. I have experience working for a city and in a volunteer organization within the city. Both those roles have given me the opportunity to understand what's important to me and what's important to our communities and I want to bring those values forward to governance.
How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words
The structure creates gaps or duplication that lead to worse outcomes, I would support consolidation of some functions or municipalities
Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words
I believe that the distance between the levels of government is hindering effective transit and transportation planning. As both a cyclist, and a candidate I see that the vast majority of holes in our cycling network in Waterloo exist on the Regional Roads (Northfield, University, Columbia, Erb). I believe that if there was better co-ordination of priorities between levels, we could do this better. This extends as well to coordination between cities of cycling and bus networks, which despite the GRT being regionally operated, isnโt coordinated across cities as well as it could be.