Janet Cox
City/Township Council ยท Woolwich Ward 3
Back to candidatesHousing & Homelessness 3 questions
Housing & Homelessness
- Prioritize rapid acquisition or conversion of existing buildings
- Partner with non-profit and supportive housing providers
- Use publicly owned land for permanent or interim housing
- Establish and maintain clear minimum standards (sanitation, safety, outreach)
- Expand the hours and capacity of extreme-weather shelter protections beyond current levels
- Require that enforcement actions be linked to the availability of adequate indoor alternatives
- Establish clear regional leadership with coordinated municipal roles
- Actively advocate to the province for defined funding triggers and program supports
- Publish ongoing performance metrics (e.g. housing placements, shelter bed access)
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words
Urgently provide safe and flexible and publicly supported deeply affordable micro-house communities with access to communal spaces, support services and public transit.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on housing?candidate's own words
I would like to see regulations that enable the rapid construction of compact neighborhoods that are deeply affordable, with supportive communal spaces, natural environmental infrastructure and transit connected.
Getting Around 4 questions
Getting Around
- Reallocate space on selected streets (e.g. road diets, transit lanes, protected bike lanes)
- Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
- Connect rural communities with safe
- separated routes. Consider Mennonite horse needs as well.
- Use transit to shape land use
- Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
- Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
- Prioritize expanding coverage area
- Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
No, maintain the current system where property owners clear adjacent sidewalks
Improve existing subsidies and discounts, but maintain fares for most riders
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on transportation?candidate's own words
I think we should have strong public transportation options, but I support innovations like transit on demand and an electrified fleet to align fully with sustainability goals and cost-effectiveness
If you selected "Yes, for specific groups" above, which groups?candidate's own words
People with disabilities, Low-income residents, Youth (age 12 and under)
Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words
Operational and environmental sustainability
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
I am actually not pro growth if that means urban sprawl. I'd like to see intesified settlements irrespective of transportation.
Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words
Shantz Station Road from Hwy 7 to Kossuth Road is a natural N/S route connecting Woolwich to Cambridge and it is very dangerous. I would like to see a safe, separated route.
Climate & Sustainability 3 questions
Climate & Sustainability
- Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
- Commitments passed by previous councils, like the 50x30 pledge or declarations of climate emergencies, should guide current council decision making
- Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
- Create financial incentives for low-carbon construction (e.g. development charge reductions, expedited approvals, density bonuses)
- Require green infrastructure as part of development approvals (e.g. stormwater management, tree canopy, permeable surfaces)
- Use development agreements to require climate sustainability measures as a condition of approval
- Require climate risk and lifecycle cost analysis in major capital decisions
- Prioritize active transportation and transit investment
- Require an assessment of impacts on aquifer recharge
Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words
There should be strict energy performance standards for all municipal buildings and affordable housing. The energy savings will save money and benefit the environment at the same time.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on sustainability?candidate's own words
In a time of climate change and an affordability crisis, ALL decisions should be subjected to a lens of sustainability. Wasting energy, water and other resources wastes taxpayer dollars.
Food Systems & Security 3 questions
Food Systems & Security
- Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
- Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
- Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
- Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
- Leave local food livelihoods to the private market
- Partner with local charities, non-profits, and other organizations to strengthen access to food and redistribution of surplus food and produce for low-income residents
- Support local food procurement for school food programs, including processing/preparation infrastructure, food literacy, and youth learning opportunities
- Support programs to prepare food for those who are unhoused or unable to cook
- Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
- Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
- Encourage and support private landowners to make lots available for food provisioning
Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words
I would support a program of giving low income or food insecure people money to pay market value for local farm produce. This can support local farmer and the dignity of the food insecure.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on food systems?candidate's own words
I would like to see education and encouragement for people to buy local food. I think children should learn basic thrifty food preparation of local food in school.
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Support our local mennonite farmer neighbours who provide us with infrastructure like chicken processing that makes raising food on a local and smale scale feasible.
Growth & Planning 4 questions
Growth & Planning
- Prioritize infill and intensification where infrastructure
- Require detailed cost and risk analysis before approving
- Use development phasing tied to infrastructure capacity
- Limit outward growth unless full lifecycle infrastructure
- Proceed with outward growth to address housing supply
- Expand as-of-right zoning to reduce case-by-case political decisions on housing forms
- Allow small-scale housing forms city-wide as-of-right (e.g. up to four units per lot)
- Eliminate parking minimum requirements
- Use public engagement to inform design, not to veto density
- Phase or adjust density in response to neighbourhood concerns about design or servicing capacity
- Approve density where infrastructure capacity already exists
- Pair density approvals with targeted infrastructure upgrades
- Accept short-term constraints in order to meet housing demand
Describe one concrete zoning, planning, or development decision you would support (or oppose) that reflects how you would balance these priorities.candidate's own words
I support as-of-right permissions for missing middle housing in areas intended for housing, but never at the expensive of local forest or meadow infrastructure.
Please describe one concrete example of a growth or infrastructure decision you would support or oppose using this approach.candidate's own words
Support the construction of new developments that prioritize higher density housing models that support natural area enhancement and transit connection.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on growth?candidate's own words
I would be in favour of alternate models of community growth that favour eco-village and neighbourhood models that are integrated into the natural environment, provide opportunity for local habitat enhancement and local food production and have low carbon, healthy transportation modes integrated.
Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words
Support innovative service demonstration models.
What can the municipality/region do, if anything, about land which sits vacant for years because it is being used as an investment (land banking)?candidate's own words
Vacant land can be taxed with provision given for NOT taxing areas that are actually providing important ecological services. Vacant housing should be taxed as a dis-incentive.
Budget & Taxes 5 questions
Budget & Taxes
It should be more transparent and accessible
- Moderate, predictable tax increases to maintain service levels
- Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
- Rapidly implement energy saving technologies that lower the consumption of energy by municipal buildings and transportation to save money and green house gas emissions in the future.
- Re-evaluate development incentives or subsidies that create long-term liabilities
- Higher level governments should pay a greater share of sustainable long-term infrastructure costs
- especially when promoting or mandating growth strategies.
- Adjust service delivery models to reduce costs without reducing access
- ensure that services that protect the environment
- mitigate against climate change and support low-income and vulnerable residents are maintained.
- Prioritize maintenance and state-of-good-repair over expansion
- Require lifecycle cost analysis before approving any new infrastructure
- All new capital projects should be durable and energy efficient to decrease unecessary energy use and repair costs.
Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words
Seeking technical innovations that can accomplish needed services more efficiently and therefore cost effectively. Seek industry partners for demonstration projects and sponsorship to offset costs to taxpayers.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on budgets?candidate's own words
Plain language and graphic summaries that are up to date and using plain language should be available. Understanding budgets and financial literacy should be part of school curricula.
If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words
Budgets should be shared with residents in a way that is clear and understandable. Tools to interpret information in a clear and non-technical way should be explored.
About the Candidate3 questions
About the Candidate
Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words
I would like to contribute to sustainable decision making for my township.
How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words
I feel that while decisions at the Regional level reflect ecological realities of watershed and landscape scale natural processes and transportation and social services needs, that democracy is best served by seeking input at the Township level.
Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words
Decisions about land use that affects regional scale ecological processes and social realities are hindered by being made the sole responsibility of the lowest tier, township municipalities. We need to see "the big picture"