Scott Piatkowski

City/Township Council Β· Waterloo Ward 5

Back to candidates
This candidate finalized their responses after this guide and scoring methodology was published.
Housing & Homelessness 3 questions

Housing & Homelessness

How should municipalities and the Region balance providing permanent housing with the management of encampments in public spaces?select up to 3 per part
A. Pathways to permanent housing
  • Prioritize rapid acquisition or conversion of existing buildings
  • Partner with non-profit and supportive housing providers
  • Use publicly owned land for permanent or interim housing
B. Interim management of encampments
  • Establish and maintain clear minimum standards (sanitation, safety, outreach)
  • Expand the hours and capacity of extreme-weather shelter protections beyond current levels
  • Require that enforcement actions be linked to the availability of adequate indoor alternatives
C. Accountability and collaboration between levels of government
  • Establish clear regional leadership with coordinated municipal roles
  • Actively advocate to the province for defined funding triggers and program supports
  • Publish ongoing performance metrics (e.g. housing placements, shelter bed access)

Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to address both encampments and permanent housing.candidate's own words

I support collaborating with a local non-profit on the development of new affordable housing at 250 Lincoln Road (ideally three story townhomes), which was the condition when the property was purchased using funds from the federal Housing Accelerator Fund and the city's Affordable Housing Reserve.

Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on housing?candidate's own words

I have more than 30 years of direct experience in managing successful area non-profit housing co-ops and currently work for a national NGO that supports the community housing movement. Having a subject matter expert at the table when these issues are discussed would be a benefit to the city.

Getting Around 4 questions

Getting Around

How should municipalities use existing street infrastructure to better prioritize walking, cycling, and public transit?select up to 3
  • Reallocate space on selected streets (e.g. road diets, transit lanes, protected bike lanes)
  • Adjust signal timing, curb use, or intersection design
  • Prioritize active transportation improvements during routine resurfacing
What role should public transit play in regional growth, and how should future transit investments be prioritized?ranked from highest to lowest importance
  1. Invest in rapid transit to anchor growth
  2. Use transit to shape land use
  3. Prioritize expanding coverage area
  4. Prioritize maximizing operational efficiency
  5. Prioritize lower-cost or incremental transit improvements
Do you support the municipality taking responsibility for snow removal from sidewalks adjacent to private properties?single choice

Yes, sidewalks should be cleared alongside roads as part of regular winter maintenance

Do you support expanding fare-free transit for the Region?single choice

Yes, for specific groups

If you selected "Yes, for specific groups" above, which groups?candidate's own words

Seniors (ex. extend Older Adult Day Pass pilot), People with disabilities, Youth (age 12 and under)

Please describe one criterion or principle that should not be compromised when making transit investment decisions.candidate's own words

Accessibility.

Other priority not listed abovecandidate's own words

Expanding the availability of Mobility Plus service.

Please name one specific street, corridor, or project where you would prioritize these changes.candidate's own words

As Ward 5 Councillor, I will work to make it safer for residents and visitors to get across the Conestoga Parkway. I want the city to work with the Region of Waterloo to explore the feasibility and cost of a pedestrian and cycling bridge over the highway between Bluevale Street North (at Mayfield Avenue) and the southern edge of Bechtel Park. I’m not an engineer, but I see no reason why such a bridge would not be technically feasible. Kitchener already has two pedestrian/cycling bridge over the Parkway, but Waterloo has none. For those who live west of the highway, a bridge would make it easier and safer to access both Bechtel Park (with its trails, soccer fields and dog park) and Parkview Cemetery. For those living on the other side of the highway, Bluevale Collegiate is all but inaccessible to students and staff who want to get there without using a car.

Climate & Sustainability 3 questions

Climate & Sustainability

How should municipalities and the Region incorporate climate and sustainability into policy, including development and infrastructure decisions?select up to 3 per part
A. Perspective on climate change
  • Climate change is an urgent and defining crisis of our time; reducing greenhouse gas emissions should be a primary consideration across municipal decision-making
  • Commitments passed by previous councils, like the 50x30 pledge or declarations of climate emergencies, should guide current council decision making
  • Our local and regional governments need to renew coordinated action towards implementing the Transform Waterloo Region strategy
B. Building and development standards
  • Where possible, require or incentivize energy efficiency standards in new development, beyond current provincial minimums
  • Require green infrastructure as part of development approvals (e.g. stormwater management, tree canopy, permeable surfaces)
  • Use development agreements to require climate sustainability measures as a condition of approval
C. Infrastructure and capital planning
  • Require climate risk and lifecycle cost analysis in major capital decisions
  • Require climate change mitigation and adaptation impact assessments for large growth decisions (greenfield expansions, settlement boundary changes)
  • Require an assessment of impacts on aquifer recharge

Describe one concrete policy, incentive, or decision you would prioritize to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Where possible, explain how it balances environmental goals with fiscal responsibility.candidate's own words

Waterloo should look at every development and site plan approval application through the lens of the impact it will have on the demand for water. In practice, that will mean limiting growth until our water issues are resolved (something that I actually advocated in my Waterloo Chronicle column way back in the late 1990s). That includes carefully reviewing major industrial uses; a moratorium should be placed on approving any such uses that would consume an inordinate amount of water, which means no new data centres in the City of Waterloo or the Region of Waterloo.

Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on sustainability?candidate's own words

The above policies may seem like hard choices, but they should have been made twenty-five years ago instead of after we discovered what every farmer in Wilmot Township already knew -- that the underground water supply is not infinite and has to be managed more responsibly. I believe that politicians of that era knew that as well, but they didn't want to admit it publicly and face criticism for stymieing economic growth.

Food Systems & Security 3 questions

Food Systems & Security

In the context of growing pressure for economic development and the connected loss of farmland, what role do municipalities and the Region hold in promoting local food livelihoods, production, and processing?ranked from highest to lowest importance
  1. Develop a local food strategy, including research on how land-use change affects the food system
  2. Partner with other levels of government to develop local food hubs that reduce costs and barriers for small businesses
  3. Promote and support low-barrier spaces for local producers to distribute and sell food
  4. Encourage and support local landowners to rent to newcomer farmers
How should municipalities and the Region approach food insecurity and affordability?select up to 3 per part
A. Access to food
  • Partner with local charities, non-profits, and other organizations to strengthen access to food and redistribution of surplus food and produce for low-income residents
  • Support local food procurement for school food programs, including processing/preparation infrastructure, food literacy, and youth learning opportunities
  • Support programs to prepare food for those who are unhoused or unable to cook
B. Access to land for growing food
  • Make public lands (Regional and municipal) available for sustenance food provisioning, including in urban and peri-urban spaces as cities expand
  • Enable access to land and resources for local people who want to grow their own food (e.g. the community-garden model)
  • Encourage and support private landowners to make lots available for food provisioning

Please describe one concrete policy, program, or decision you would support to strengthen the local food system.candidate's own words

Ensuring that all public events run by the City of Waterloo make provisions for how to get leftover food to those who are hungry.

Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on food systems?candidate's own words

While the Wilmot land acquisition is a Region of Waterloo issue (spurred and funded by the province), I will advocate that Waterloo's representatives on Regional Council (including the Mayor of Waterloo) withdraw their support for proceeding with the destruction of farmland in favour of an unspecified major industrial use.

Growth & Planning 4 questions

Growth & Planning

How should councils weigh the long-term cost of maintaining existing infrastructure when making decisions about outward growth and expansion?ranked from highest to lowest importance
  1. Limit outward growth unless full lifecycle infrastructure
  2. Require detailed cost and risk analysis before approving
  3. Prioritize infill and intensification where infrastructure
  4. Use development phasing tied to infrastructure capacity
How should councils balance provincial and regional mandates for increased housing density with neighbourhood opposition and local infrastructure constraints?select up to 4 per part
A. Planning & zoning tools
  • Expand as-of-right zoning to reduce case-by-case political decisions on housing forms
  • Focus incremental density near transit, schools, and commercial areas
  • Require area-specific planning studies before permitting additional density
B. Managing neighbourhood opposition
  • Use public engagement to inform design, not to veto density
  • Phase or adjust density in response to neighbourhood concerns about design or servicing capacity
  • Require demonstrated city-wide benefits to justify local impacts
C. Infrastructure & servicing
  • Approve density where infrastructure capacity already exists
  • Pair density approvals with targeted infrastructure upgrades
  • Use development charges or conditions to fund needed upgrades

Describe one concrete zoning, planning, or development decision you would support (or oppose) that reflects how you would balance these priorities.candidate's own words

I think we need more housing over commercial spaces, including strip malls. An excellent example is 255 Woolwich Street, which has street level commercial (with parking behind) and residential units above (with entrances at the back). This is in a neighbourhood that is otherwise single family residential or green space.

Please describe one concrete example of a growth or infrastructure decision you would support or oppose using this approach.candidate's own words

A vacant unit tax would provide building owners with an incentive to keep units occupied. There are areas of the city where a significant number of housing units are boarded up, waiting until the owner decides to proceed with redevelopment. There are others where dilapidated buildings slated for demolition are occupied but are a blight on the neighbourhood because of the poor enforcement of property standards.

What can the municipality/region do, if anything, about land which sits vacant for years because it is being used as an investment (land banking)?candidate's own words

I'm very concerned about former gas station sites around the city being left vacant, not only because the land isn't being used, but because that vacancy is driven by wanting to avoid site cleanup. I want Council to request an inventory those sites and a strategy to encourage or possibly compel owners to clean them up and get them shovel ready for new development.

Budget & Taxes 5 questions

Budget & Taxes

Do you think the Region's or municipality's budget process should be more transparent and accessible to residents?single choice

It should be more transparent and accessible

Municipal and regional costs have generally risen faster than revenues restricted by property tax rules and limited local revenue tools. How would you balance tax increases against maintaining service levels and long-term financial sustainability?select up to 3 per part
A. Revenue approaches
  • Moderate, predictable tax increases to maintain service levels
  • Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
  • Exploring new local revenue tools where permitted by provincial legislation
D. Growth & cost recovery
  • Re-evaluate development incentives or subsidies that create long-term liabilities
B. Service levels
  • Maintain current service levels, even if taxes rise
  • Adjust service delivery models to reduce costs without reducing access
C. Capital & infrastructure
  • Prioritize maintenance and state-of-good-repair over expansion
  • Require lifecycle cost analysis before approving any new infrastructure

Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words

I would oppose any scheme to privatize services. First, because there is no evidence that it saves money, but also because I am philosophically opposed to private interests profiting off essential public services.

Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on budgets?candidate's own words

The RIM Park debt (an example of poor Council oversight in the past) will finally be paid off in 2031. That will ease some of the fiscal pressure that the City of Waterloo has felt since 2001 (removing $19 million a year in debt payments from the budget) and provide Council with a range of choices, from limiting tax increases, to building reserves, to enhancing services -- or some combination of the three. While the next term of council ends in November 2030, it will fall to this group of Councillors to plan for this sea-change in municipal finances.

If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words

Posting explainer videos showing how money is raised and how it is spent, as well as which areas the municipality has discretion and which ones they do not.

About the Candidate3 questions

About the Candidate

Why are you running for this position?candidate's own words

I'm running because I know that I would be the kind of representative for my ward that I and my Ward 5 neighbours want and deserve. I have eight years of experience as a public school board trustee (including serving as both Chair and Vice-Chair), during which time I fiercely advocated for students and their families as well as for teachers and other education workers. I have consistently delivered results, such as successfully advocating for the pedestrian crossing signal that has been installed on Weber Street at Bristol Street. With the recent changes in the role of trustee (limiting their involvement in budgeting, problem-solving and collective bargaining, for example), I honestly feel that I can make more or a difference as a city councillor than I could by continuing to serve as a trustee. Shortly after the incumbent in my ward announced her intention to not seek re-election, the Minister of Education was musing about actually eliminating the role of trustee. By the time he backed away from doing that, I had already been talking to my neighbours in Ward 5 about whether they thought I should run for Waterloo City Council. The response was overwhelmingly positive and quite enthusiastic. I'm gratified that so many people have appreciated my work both as a school trustee as as a community volunteer (chairing numerous municipal committees and leading many non-profit organizations, as well as volunteering as a soccer coach and youth leadership camp facilitator). I am hoping to win voters' support to continue my service to the community in a different capacity.

How does the current two-tier structure of municipal and regional government affect the Region's ability to make coherent decisions on housing, planning, and infrastructure?candidate's own words

The structure creates gaps or duplication that lead to worse outcomes, Structural reform deserves serious study before the next election cycle, I would support consolidation of some functions or municipalities

Please describe one specific area where you think the governance structure helps or hinders good decision-making.candidate's own words

In terms of what works, I think the EngageWR platform, with portals for each of the cities and townships in the Region of Waterloo is a good example of constructive collaboration. In terms of what doesn't work, I've had many voters in Ward 5 ask why there are such different rules on either side of the Kitchener-Waterloo. The cities have very different rules for overnight parking, backyard fires and election signage, to cite just three examples. I’m proposing that there be a committee created soon after the election consisting of Councillors and staff from both Waterloo and Kitchener to seek common ground on bylaws, including those that I've mentioned. To do that, I would need to get a motion passed by Waterloo City Council and to find a champion in Kitchener to move the same motion. I’m confident that this scenario is not only plausible but that it would have support from residents on both sides of the city boundary. The result may be one city adopting the other's rules, both cities agreeing to new rules, or continued differences if that still makes sense (or if agreement can’t be reached on what rules to adopt).