Scott Piatkowski
City/Township Council ยท Waterloo Ward 5
Back to candidatesBudget & Taxes
It should be more transparent and accessible
- Moderate, predictable tax increases to maintain service levels
- Actively pursue provincial and federal transfer funding and grants
- Exploring new local revenue tools where permitted by provincial legislation
- Re-evaluate development incentives or subsidies that create long-term liabilities
- Maintain current service levels, even if taxes rise
- Adjust service delivery models to reduce costs without reducing access
- Prioritize maintenance and state-of-good-repair over expansion
- Require lifecycle cost analysis before approving any new infrastructure
Please describe one concrete example of a trade-off you would support (or oppose) when costs rise faster than revenues.candidate's own words
I would oppose any scheme to privatize services. First, because there is no evidence that it saves money, but also because I am philosophically opposed to private interests profiting off essential public services.
Would you like to provide any additional context for your views on budgets?candidate's own words
The RIM Park debt (an example of poor Council oversight in the past) will finally be paid off in 2031. That will ease some of the fiscal pressure that the City of Waterloo has felt since 2001 (removing $19 million a year in debt payments from the budget) and provide Council with a range of choices, from limiting tax increases, to building reserves, to enhancing services -- or some combination of the three. While the next term of council ends in November 2030, it will fall to this group of Councillors to plan for this sea-change in municipal finances.
If you chose "It should be more transparent and accessible", please describe how.candidate's own words
Posting explainer videos showing how money is raised and how it is spent, as well as which areas the municipality has discretion and which ones they do not.